Triangle Model
I have experienced
the triangle principal-agent model through my current job as a waitress at a restaurant
on campus. There are two principals I deal with who are the managers that work
under the owner of the restaurant. The owner is very hands-off; therefore, all
of the decisions that need to be made in regards to pricing, planning events,
deciding on specials and the current menu are under all under the control of
the managers. One of the managers is much older and is not very connected with
the restaurant’s clientele. While the other manager is a little younger, and
understands the importance of creating drink deals and food specials in order
to attract college students.
During the busier weekends like dad’s weekends, the two are
constantly arguing with one another on pricing. Because the one manager is
older he often supersedes the younger manager, even though they are on the same
level. Recently, the younger manager changed the pricing around to provide
drink deals. This ended up creating a lot more foot traffic, and made the
restaurant a significantly larger profit than it normally does on a similar
weekend. Because the older manager was not in, he was not able to stop him.
Today, after the older manager went through the receipt he called him out for
not getting it approved with him. His response went along the lines of standing
his ground and explaining that they are on the same level and should be
compromising more on different business tactics. The older manager immediately
contacted the owner of the establishment, and a meeting is set up for tomorrow
is order to settle the dispute.
In my opinion, I believe the owner needs to take a look at
the benefit the younger manager brings to the bar. The advantage the older
manager has is difference in age and several years longer of working at the bar.
My coworkers and I all agree that the older manager handles paperwork, making
the schedule, and dealing with disgruntled customers the best out of the two
principals. However, the younger principal has much new and fresh ideas on how
to keep the restaurant constantly busy.
To fix this situation I do not believe that a business like
a restaurant should have two managers. Therefore, should be a centralized
authority at every level; especially since there are not that many employees.
The owner should instead give each manager certain responsibilities based on
what they do best. For example, the younger principal should be focused on
planning different events and controlling pricing. While the older principal
should focus on dealing with employees and keeping track of wages.
If the owner decides to keep both managers working together
in the same manner as before either the two principals will need to compromise;
especially on pricing and special deals. The older manager must see the logic
behind it when recent sales suggest it works. If they cannot compromise, I see
my coworkers and myself deciding to go along and support the younger manager
over the older manager like we recently did by giving deals. The older manager
will be forced to see the importance of change when the numbers tell all. We
will have a motive also; because when more people enter the restaurant the more
tips we make. Also it make the job more worthwhile when you are constantly busy
instead of sitting in the kitchen waiting for people to come in, and prevents
from getting cut right away and making zero dollars because there is nobody in
the restaurant.
The way you told this story, I didn't see much of a triangle (especially if you were supposed to be the third leg of it). I did see conflict between the two principals, which you described quite well. But you didn't describe much at all how that conflict impacted you and your coworkers. So it would be good to consider that in your response to this comment.
ReplyDeleteThe other thing you might consider is wether the structure once made sense, but no longer does. Can one manager do all the work that the two now share? If so, why are there two managers?
I do believe in loyalty, and some of our gift exchange discussion is about just that. You kind of suggest the owner should let the old manager go. The owner may be reluctant to do that, either for personal or business reasons. But there may be a practical reason as well. Is being a manager of a bar of decent job for somebody who has initiative? If the person can eventually do better, then the owner might perceive some turnover risk from the younger manager. Keeping the older manager around would be a kind of self-insurance.
I'm guessing. I don't know the business issues at all. But you might understand the conflict you describe in light of those background considerations.